Fiji Apologiste - Trotter's self-censorship takes a chisel to his own history [UPDATED]
Maybe it's because of comments like this from my post earlier today?:
Every day the fools in the blogosphere like DPF and Whaleoil and Chris Trotter are being proven embarrassingly far out of their depth as they continue to assume that the motivation of the military dictator is to bring an electoral utopia to Fiji where indigenous Fijians (of which the military is almost entirely composed) will be stripped of every political advantage they have... in order to advance (through the new democratic order) the economic agenda of the large Indian population (which is ultimately aimed towards seizing the native title off the Fijians once all the posturing and intellectualising has evaporated).
Well I can't accuse Chris Trotter of hypocrisy when it comes to tacitly backing Fijian censorship - he's gone and self-censored his blog. He has completely wiped his own post in which he slates Kiwipolitico blogger "Lew" over his supposed racism for favouring an end to the military dicatorship and in which Chris argues in favour of the regime. I had bookmarked it to get stuck into at a later date - but tonight upon clicking it... nothing... page doesn't exist. Went to his blog and... nothing... gone. It was entitled "Fiji Agonistes."
These are the antics of the professional writer-turned-blogger, reminiscent of our dear departed Poneke (now safely barricaded behind a privacy wall), who alters the record to protect his outside reputation, only to find the attempt at cleansing his copy book without any explanation intensifies the damage.
I do not wish to discourage Chris from blogging by mentioning these things - since the blogosphere is enhanced by his presence and the Left is better off for having someone decent to argue with - but the temptation to excise a dicky column online (when one cannot in print) must have been overwhelming given the sudden deterioration in Fiji this week. I think that is a cop out. If you write it you have to own it and defend it... or concede that just maybe you might have had it wrong. Most bloggers have been forced to re-think their position in light of new facts - it's not at all uncommon.
Now I could have it all wrong myself - Chris could be in the middle of a re-write that will knock Lew on his pasty white (and I'll have to remember it here because it's deleted) "Pakeha kupapa" arse. Or Lew could have taken offence at the tone and Chris may have just decided to remove the whole thing rather than do a rewrite. (This may possibly be the case as I recall my immediate reaction to reading it was to think if he had argued that way against me it would have been blogs blazing at 30 paces.) But at the moment that sort of wholesale erasure, without explanation, is just not a good look in the blogosphere.
Lew's trashing of Chris' "torrid" Whanganui/Wanganui piece - and the first post that references the "settlers" that Chris took great offence to in his deleted post - might have had a lot to do with the personal animosity between the two characters. So I'll quote from Chris' own words from his "h" article (where did the re-post on his blog go?... hmmm, was there ever one? We just don't know anymore) on Stuff:
THE ancient Egyptians understood very well this link between the names of things and the ability of men to recall them.
Which is why, when they wanted to annihilate all memory of their enemies, they took a chisel to their names, carved in hieroglyphs on their tombs and monuments.
Get rid of the name: get rid of the person.
Get rid of the blog post: get rid of the problem?
And courtesy of the technically superior Idiot/Savant (with his own critique of Trotter: "the problem is his entire political philosophy")
Cached for all to see. Inevitable really. -
Chris (complete with a giant portrait of himself with his piercing gaze and pale, Aryan, eyes staring directly - directly at me in particular) has issued a READER ADVISORY on the matter this morning on the deletion issue:
Because I wrote the posting in anger. Because I wrote it badly. Because it was unfair to Lew over at Kiwipolitico. And because, politically speaking, it was crap.
Bowalley Road is not a diary - it's a portfolio. What's more, it's my portfolio. If I post something which later strikes me as being of poor quality, or unfair, or politically misguided, I reserve the right to get rid of it.
If that offends the sensibilities of some blogosphere purists, then I'm sorry. But, for me, a blog is a creative enterprise, and, like all creative enterprises, subject to redaction.
Here endeth the lesson.
If Chris is running it purely as a portfolio - which is not a bad way to view the function of a blog (especially for a professional writer) - then so be it. It's the method of quality control that raises eyebrows. My criticism of the practice of a complete deletion - without explanation - still stands however. It isn't just about style, format, netiquette and "sensibilities" - it's about the credibility of the blog and it's usefulness to readers by maintaining some semblance of coherence, order and reliability. That begins to fade when a reader finds things missing on a regular basis. Readers of Poneke's blog, like myself, were frustrated - and a little amused - to discover all manner of posts disappeared.
Blogging (even if a blog has no comments section) in the context of the blogosphere is part of a conversation, a discourse. When parts of that conversation are deleted it makes things confusing.
Why did Poneke wholesale delete? As with Chris, I suspect it was to both protect himself from reader's comments and to protect the portfolio. Commercially it is quite sound to expunge dicky columns should a potential client/employer stumble across it, personally it may have been wise to cut a post that doesn't sit well upon later reflection; but it just doesn't suit blogging to do this without so much as an explanation.
You have to appreciate the candid honesty and self-criticism in the advisory though - you don't often see that in the blogosphere, let alone the media generally unless the BSA or some other authority has ordered it.
This afternoon Chris' online sparring partner/blogging bete noir/dick-waving combatant, Lew, at Kiwipolitico has gone on the record too:
Kiwipolitico is not the place for perpetuating such disagreements, and so I’ll leave it be with a few final words.
I remain a bit disappointed that Chris hasn’t bothered to engage with my previous critiques, and I agree somewhat with Lurgee’s assessment that he’s been dickwaving to try to gain status as “the alpha-male of the leftish bloglands”. While I was indeed furious enough with the personal attacks* to come out blazing against them, I was not behind the redaction; that’s Chris’ own doing. So, Chris, thank you - and while nothing is forgotten, I appreciate your good sense in this matter.
How refreshingly civilised. --UPDATE ENDS]