- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Monday, April 04, 2011

Urewera trial a sham

Urewera raids cases to be heard without jury
The 18 people arrested during the Urewera "terror" raids have been denied a trial by jury. Instead, their cases will be heard by a lone judge. In December the High Court ruled the case should be heard only by a judge. Despite objections by the defence for the 18 accused, the Court of Appeal yesterday announced it would uphold the High Court ruling. Suppression orders prevent the publication of the reasons behind both courts' decisions.

This now stinks. No Jury trial against the State and the reasons why the Court have decided to deny these citizens of NZ their right to a Jury trial has been suppressed.

The Urewera 18 were a group of chums who played soldier up in the ranges and were targeted as a radical training camp and as a result felt the full force of Police paranoia and over reaction.

Now while I have little time for activists or activist gangsters who pick up guns, and accept that if it had been the National Front who had been running around playing militia, then I would want an eye cast over their activities as well, the over reaction in a land steeped in as much righteous historic injustice as Tuhoe land however in an almost identical incident to their original land confiscation was ignorant and offensive of the Police.

Tama Iti and his merry militia are no more terrorists than I am, (except they go camping), they should never have been apprehended in this manner with these powers, if the concern was so great the Police should have gone directly to Tama Iti to discuss the issue with him, the fact was that the local Police would go to Tama Iti as an outreach person they could use to talk down any hot headedness by any of the locals.

When a blind panicked post 9/11 Parliament breathlessly passed the Terrorism Suppression Act in 2002 , the Green Party and the Maori Party predicted it would be used against Maori and activists, not against terrorists. The Act was found to be so impossible to use, the Judge had no problem dumping it.

Which brings us to the here and now with the decision the case will not be heard by a jury. Now, the Court has that power, but it's supposed to be used in complex cases where the evidence is difficult, this case isn't that complex and these citizens deserve the same rights as any of us, especially as it is the State they have been accused of attacking. They are NZers, and they have the legal right to be heard by a jury of their peers and not by the State appointed Judge, Jury and Executioner.



At 4/4/11 7:23 am, Blogger Deborah said...

in an almost identical incident to their original land confiscation was ignorant and offensive of the Police.

I suspect that it wasn't ignorant at all. I think that setting up their checkpoint on the original confiscation line was deliberate, a calculated reminder to Tuhoe about who is the boss.


Post a Comment

<< Home