- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Referendumb


Group calls for veto of referendum
A high-powered government committee has called for a veto of a proposed referendum aimed at making citizen-initiated referendums binding. The Legislation Advisory Committee, chaired by former Prime Minister Sir Geoffrey Palmer, says the proposed public vote should not be allowed because it would contradict the fundamental purpose of the Citizens Initiated Referenda Act 1993, which provided for non-binding referendums.

People I can’t stress this enough, having a none binding referendum to make none binding referendums retrospectively binding requires a mental flexibility only years of not reading could allow.

There still seems to be some confusion on this whole repeal of section 59 thing. You’re not to blame, the media were outrageous in selling this as the criminalization of parents so it’s okay if you got a bit spooked. What the repeal of section 59 means is that IF you are charged with assaulting your child, IF, you can’t use discipline as a defense. The bloke who bashes his kid with a belt and gets charged with assault can't say, "But your honour, I was disciplining the kid" - that doesn't wash in Court any longer - that’s all it means, it doesn’t mean that if your toddler was about to put his hand on a burning stove while running onto the road into the path of a stolen car and you smack their hand lightly that the Police Eagle helicopter will suddenly spotlight you and through a loud hailer tell you to lie flat on the ground with your hands above your head.

1 Comments:

At 17/11/09 11:46 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Wait, so we are allowed to smack our kids if it's to discipline them? Or just if they're in immediate danger?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home