Foreshore & Seabed review - racist "recreational" groups whip up hate

That was the ministerial panel's view and most submitters, but the 5% or so of submissions in favour of the confiscation Act must amount to the thoughts of the British settler consciousness whose agenda was race extinguishment and a forced annexation of the country. Their paranoia, bigotry and willful ignorance lives on. The only divisive element is them. They have confessed this and more yesterday.Steve, when you say in your own press release: "Mr Veail rejected any likely accusations of racism" - you are a racist. And the race tirade of Pakeha mythology by the guardians of the white race privilege - the licensing and control of their river fish - goes into hyper-drive. Hypocrites in the extreme. Racists to the core. Does Steve speak on behalf of his Maori members - or aren't they part of his "cultural unity" project. Steve Veail is a poisonous throw-back to White New Zealand.

Enjoy the toxic mantras of the white devils. [I'll add comments as we go.]

Thursday, 2 July 2009, 1:52 pm

Press Release: Council of Outdoor Recreation Associations
Foreshore and Sea Bed Issue a 'Divisive Minefield'

[divisive? eh? between who? Why?... eh?]

The resurgence of debate over the foreshore and seabed ownership is a divisive minefield says the Council of Outdoor Recreation Associations of New Zealand (CORANZ).

[Who? these turkeys?:The interests of the various organisations involved in modes of killing: stalking, hunting, shooting, fishing and the squatters' rights upon which their European game sport is often premised is what this organisation represents. And shortly to be unrobed as the local branch of the KKK. Their key issues:

"Our Action Programme below is listed under each of the Council’s four Constitution objects -
A Strong Outdoor Recreational User Voice
Land and Water Protection and Wise Management
Public Ownership and Management
Public Access"

They put their manifesto out for the last election - maybe on the Excl.Breth. database, who knows?

And spreading race hate to expand their own imported ethnic cultural quirks and property advantages more akin to any feudalism than what they claim Maori customary rights are isn't on that list, but that is what they do. That's right - we shouldn't be able to buy certain fish in this country because they think it might affect them controlling their European fishery over which they are claiming some historical and cultural right... and of ownership. But Maori of course are to have no say whatsoever in the native fish or anything else. The European fish inland is the property of the Crown and the rights belong with the designated Pakeha organisation that has customarily owned it under the Crown; and all the other fish is public with Maori having no rights - that's the gist here.

It's not a Maori organisation obviously - so the question is what sort of an organisation is CORANZ? But fishing for their fish is a privilege licensed by the Crown. The Queen's game and fowl. The English rights. On their logic surely if the Fish & Game Councils are to be controlled by it's traditional core stakeholder group and by their own custom then Maori should have control over stray mongrel dogs on the same basis - and over the kiore.A "long-standing and important tradition" is something that can be abbreviated to "4WD"? The right for these turkeys to ya-hoo through everyone's backyard is being described as a "tradition"? And yet Maori have no tradition worth speaking of as far as this Pakeha organisation is concerned! This is their extraordinary position.

Contrary to what they claim they are in favour of a public access right for themselves to wander around anywhere rural and a more expensive tariff for foreigners on what they see as their special privilege for a reason - so that they may charge as guides and commercialise those rights. Oh yes - that is about right. It all points to furthering the commercialisation of their "sport" over which they control and influence bans and property rights and trade barriers - they want a general right of access so they can take tourists up and they can charge them more because their tourist license is (relatively) higher. I've posted on this between the lines agenda several times before.]

CORANZ co-chairman Steve Veail says the Treaty of Waitangi was a 50-50 partnership treaty between two cultures, Maori and European designed to create a united culture and society of the future.

[WTF? Partnerships with cultures? It is a constitutional arrangement not bloody Eurovision. And here's just another example of the hypocrisy.In the election policy they were despairing of "partnership" and Treaty - now he's trying to be cute about it. This is what it says:
"eg the "principle" of "partnership" - nowhere in the Treaty do the words "partnership" or "principles" appear. Sir Douglas Graham has confirmed that no 'principle of 'equal' partnership' and attendant assumptions of Maori sovereignty, dual governance or co-management exists. "

- And now the co-imperial wizard is using the term:
"the Treaty of Waitangi was a 50-50 partnership"

Which is it, Grand Cyclops? - the flock is confused.]

"The granting of ownership to just one ethnic group is against the spirit of the Treaty," he said.

[His assumptions are all wrong and his conclusion is a pitiful mockery. Firstly, it's not a "granting" - it is not the Crown's to grant as it had no prior legally tenable ownership before the Act in dispute was passed (- or else they wouldn't have passed it - and they didn't want to take it to London), and secondly, "one ethnic group" is both an obvious and pointless observation as it is an historical fact as much as it is an irrelevancy for the purposes of determining what the rights are of the units and people who are guaranteed British citizenship and have guaranteed property rights and local autonomy. That's what the Treaty is all about - not some creepy "unified culture" - an implausiblilty when the person proposing it is hostile and abusive to the culture and people of this land.

Mr Veail rejected any likely accusations of racism.

Beautiful. I'm not making this up. He probably wrote that himself too. It's a heavy vibe and it's all through CORANZ election documents and this press release. No Maori would want to join these redneck clubs after becoming aware of their anti-Maori public policy positions. Hmmm, maybe that's why they make them?

"CORANZ would be expressing concerns if ownership was given to just indigenous non-Maori New Zealanders," he said.

He said ownership arguments were futile and unrealistic since there are no full-blooded Maori families in New Zealand.

[The great "argument" of the racists who claim they are not interested in a person's race, is now all about blood. That a Pakeha definition of Maori - their mythical European definition - should determine the matter in Aotearoa?]

Talk of injustices and grievances of 150 years ago were equally futile. Injustices have happened between Maori and Maori and pre-Maori tribes, between Europeans and Europeans.

[All the classic Pakeha mythology wheeled out on cue: Mori-ori getting a look in as always and the "everything's in the past" line. Of course if you look above you will see quite clearly how proud they are to say that their Pakeha rights go back 130 years and are "strongly supported." Hypocritical.]

"We are all Kiwis. We must go forward as one," said Mr Veail.

ends

Steve Veail is self-proclaimed "Kiwi" and he's also a hate-mongering, racist moron.