- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Friday, January 02, 2009

People in poppy houses

The NY Times' Dexter Filkins (love the name) on the Afghan government's rampant, systemic corruption:

Need to settle a lawsuit over the ownership of your house? About $25,000, depending on the judge.

“It is very shameful, but probably I will pay the bribe,” Mohammed Naim, a young English teacher, said as he stood in front of the Secondary Courthouse in Kabul. His brother had been arrested a week before, and the police were demanding $4,000 for his release. “Everything is possible in this country now. Everything.”
[...]
A raft of investigations has concluded that people at the highest levels of the Karzai administration, including President Karzai’s own brother, Ahmed Wali Karzai, are cooperating in the country’s opium trade, now the world’s largest. In the streets and government offices, hardly a public transaction seems to unfold here that does not carry with it the requirement of a bribe, a gift, or, in case you are a beggar, “harchee” — whatever you have in your pocket.

The corruption, publicly acknowledged by President Karzai, is contributing to the collapse of public confidence in his government and to the dramatic resurgence of the Taliban, whose fighters have moved to the outskirts of the capital.
[...]
“This government has lost the capacity to govern because a shadow government has taken over,” said Ashraf Ghani, a former Afghan finance minister. He quit that job in 2004, he said, because the state had been taken over by drug traffickers. “The narco-mafia state is now completely consolidated.”

On the streets here, tales of corruption are as easy to find as kebab stands. Everything seems for sale: public offices, access to government services, even a person’s freedom. The above mentioned examples — $25,000 to settle a lawsuit, $6,000 to bribe the police, $100,000 to secure a job as a provincial police chief — were told by people who experienced them directly or witnessed the transaction.

People pay bribes for large things, and for small things, too: to get electricity for their homes, to get out of jail, even to enter the airport.

Governments in developing countries are often riddled by corruption. But Afghans say the corruption they see now has no precedent, in either its brazenness or in its scale. Transparency International, a German firm that gauges honesty in government, ranked Afghanistan 117 out of 180 countries in 2005. This year, it fell to 176.
[...]
Nowhere is the scent of corruption so strong as in the Kabul neighborhood of Sherpur [the] wealthiest enclave in the country, a series of gaudy, grandiose mansions that sell for hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Afghans refer to them as “poppy houses.” Sherpur itself is often jokingly referred to as “Char-pur,” which literally means “City of Loot.”

One of the mansions — three stories, several bedrooms, sweeping balconies — is owned by Abdul Jabbar Sabit, a former attorney general who made a name for himself by declaring a “jihad” against corruption.
[...]
An even grander mansion — ornate faux Greek columns, a towering fountain — is owned by Kabul’s police chief, Mohammed Ayob Salangi. It can be had for $11,000 a month. Mr. Salangi’s salary is unknown; that of Mr. Karzai, the president, is about $600 a month.

Mr. Ghani, the former finance minister, said the plots of land on which the mansions of Sherpur stand were doled out early in the Karzai administration for prices that were a tiny fraction of what they were worth. (Mr. Ghani said he was offered a plot, too, and refused to accept it.)

“The money for these houses was illegal, I think,” said Mohammed Yosin Usmani, director general of a newly created anticorruption unit.
[...]
Amin Farhang, the minister of commerce, was voted out of Mr. Karzai’s cabinet by Parliament earlier last month for failing to bring down the price of oil in Afghanistan as the price declined in international markets. In a long talk in the sitting room of his home, Mr. Farhang recounted a two-year struggle to fire the man in charge of giving out licenses for new businesses.

The man, Mr. Farhang said, would grant a license only in exchange for a hefty bribe. But Mr. Farhang found that he was unable to fire the man, who, he said, simply bribed other members of the government to reinstate him.

“In a job like this, a man can make 10 or 12 times his salary,” Mr. Farhang said. “People do anything to hang on to them.”


The shake-downs are what undermines confidence in the established order - history is littered with harsh generals and war lords who gain popularity, respect and fear by offering clarity and their own cruel brand of justice to replace the arbitrary and petty corruption of weak administrations.

8 Comments:

At 2/1/09 9:37 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Blaming the victims for the systematic violence which Israel inflicted on the Palestinian people has been an Israeli-Western policy of dehumanising the Palestinian people.

Israel has also requested that Hamas renounces “violence." And because the violence is Israel’s violence and Hamas is unable to stop it, Hamas is guilty. So, the Israeli government found a good pretext to increase the brutality and terror against the Palestinian people. Israel will continue the violence and the dispossession of the Palestinians while Western governments are supporting Israel’s genocidal policy against the Palestinian people.

 
At 2/1/09 9:44 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

A friend forwarded to me the most original greeting for the New Year: "I wish in 2009 a horrible year for all war criminals and their accomplices." I could not but think of whether some United Nations officials can be counted among such "accomplices."

Over the last two days, various UN officials stated that the percentage of civilians among those Palestinians killed in the current Israeli war of aggression on Gaza is about "25 percent" and is "likely to increase." Assuming the best of intentions, stating such a painfully low figure reflects shabby research or scandalous incompetence. At worst, it reveals intentional deception and misinformation that can only benefit the already massive and well-oiled Israeli public relations machine.

The UN's complicity in Israel's propaganda war is the latest, albeit hardly ever mentioned, dimension of the international organization's utter failure in defending its principles, foremost among which are the prevention of war and the promotion of peace, when performing such a duty is expected to stir the wrath of the US master and the uniquely influential Israel lobby. Not only has the UN Secretary-General betrayed the very Charter of the UN and all relevant international law principles by failing to even condemn Israel's massacre of civilians and targeting of civilian institutions and residential neighborhoods; the entire UN system has so far dealt with it as a "war" between two relatively symmetric forces, where the mightier side has sufficient justification to "defend itself," but should do so more proportionately, while the weaker side is chiefly responsible for triggering the "armed conflict."

Now, senior UN officials, excluding the particularly courageous and principled UN Special Rapporteur for human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory, Richard Falk, and a few others, are only focusing on "women and children" victims of the massacre, implying, even if unintentionally, that all Palestinian men in Gaza are fair game for the Israeli killing machine. The tens of Palestinian civilian policemen that were butchered in the opening hours of the massive Israeli attack by dozens of fighter jets were, thus, conveniently dismissed by such irresponsible UN figures of casualties as Hamas "fighters," more or less, that may be targeted with impunity. This is not to mention the scores of male teachers, doctors, workers, farmers and unemployed who were killed by Israel's indiscriminate bombing in their workplaces, public offices, homes or streets and were not accounted for as civilian victims of Israel's belligerent murder spree.

Above everything else, this UN discourse not only reduces close to half a million Palestinian men in that wretched, tormented and occupied coastal strip to "militants," radical "fighters," or whatever other nouns in currency nowadays in the astoundingly, but characteristically, biased western media coverage of the Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza, as some international law experts have described them; it also treats them as already condemned criminals that deserve the capital punishment Israel has meted out on them. I am not an expert on the history of the UN, but I suspect this sets a new low, a precedent in dehumanizing an entire adult male population in a region of "conflict," thereby justifying their fatal targeting or, at least, silently condoning it. But this should surprise no one as the same UN leaders have for 18 months watched in eerie silence or even indirectly justified, one way or another, Israel's siege of Gaza which was described by Falk as a "prelude to genocide" and compared by him to Nazi crimes.

 
At 2/1/09 10:01 pm, Blogger Tim Selwyn said...

This post is about AFGHANISTAN.

 
At 2/1/09 10:52 pm, Blogger Joe W said...

". . . arbitrary and petty corruption . . ."? You got a problem with capitalism? If the better parts of Kabul are starting to resemble Paratai Drive it's a healthy sign that property rights are both expedited and respected. "Faux" Greek columns and towering private fountains are an indication that the more astute Afghans are probably reading Atlas Shrugged, not to mention The Fountainhead.

No limp-wristed nonsense like the resource management act in Afghanistan. No local government subsidies to nonsense like the Auckland Flower Show, either, those free-enterprise poppies pay their own way. And those wealth-creators in the horticultural sector enjoy a zero-tax environment.

Anyone who can't afford to stump up a wheelbarrowload of cash to get the power on just has to be Taliban. Serve the ungrateful sods right when the last entrepreneur to leave turns out the lights.

 
At 3/1/09 9:12 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's called GST here!

 
At 4/1/09 8:51 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's called GST here!

This was a response to a post that called bribery baksheesh.
Apparently mentioning baksheesh, or correcting tim, earns a deletion.

 
At 4/1/09 1:13 pm, Blogger Tim Selwyn said...

Anon: 8:51PM
Getting personal, being abusive, being a troll, going off-topic - these are the sorts of comments that earn a deletion. I will not delete something merely because it is contrary to what I think.

 
At 6/1/09 8:11 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Getting personal, being abusive, being a troll, going off-topic - these are the sorts of comments that earn a deletion. I will not delete something merely because it is contrary to what I think.

Telling someone to travel is not abusive.
Since when did you get such a thin skin?
I mean you hurl abuse (nepenthe), surely you can take some honest criticism?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home