- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Thursday, December 28, 2006

Every Maggot has its day

Apart from the fact Exxon Mobil fund over 100 climate denier front organizations that ‘sound’ community based to hide Exxon’s financial involvement, Exxon also has a long legal history of attempting to get out of paying for any of the environmental damage they committed when their drunk and incompetent oil tanker captain ran aground off the coast of Alaskan coast. Exxon haven’t paid a cent in damages for one of the worst oil spill in Alaskan history, instead they could have put the money aside and ran their legal team off the interest, which is what has happened. Exxon argue that they have paid for the clean up and should only pay $25 million in damages, but Mr Exxon, you miss the point of damages like this – IT IS TO PUNISH YOU! The case is a reminder to us all that oil companies make rules and can pay for rules that benefit them, the only thing that moves an oil man is an Ak-47.

Court halves Exxon spill damages
A US court has almost halved the damages oil giant Exxon Mobil must pay for a 1989 oil spill off Alaska.
The San Francisco Federal appeals court reduced the payment from $4.5bn (£2.3bn) to $2.5bn (£1.3bn), saying the previous decision had been excessive. It is the third time damages in the case have been reduced. The case - started in 1994 by more than 32,000 fishermen, native Alaskans and property owners - is one of the longest non-criminal ones in US history. In the original court ruling, Exxon was ordered to pay out $5bn. Later decisions ordered the lower Alaskan court to set a lower limit for the penalty, but refused to say how much the penalty should be cut by. However, in the latest 2-1 judgement, Chief Judge Mary Schroeder and Judge Andrew Kleinfeld declared it was "time for this protracted litigation to end."

Exxon was not immediately available for comment. However, the firm has previously argued that it should have to pay no more than $25m in punitive damages in the case as it has spent $3.5bn on cleaning up the affected area and compensating victims of the spill. David Oesting, the lawyer leading the effort against Exxon Mobil for the Alaskans affected by the spill, said he was considering whether to ask for the case to be reheard by 15 judges or whether to take it to the Supreme Court. The Exxon Valdez supertanker spilled 11 million gallons of crude oil into Prince William Sound, polluting around 2,000km of coastline. Its captain, Joseph Hazelwood, admitted drinking vodka before boarding the vessel, but was acquitted of operating a ship while intoxicated. The disaster is estimated to have killed 250,000 seabirds, 2,800 sea otters, 300 harbour seals, 250 bald eagles, up to 22 killer whales, and an unknown number of salmon and herring.


At 28/12/06 2:52 pm, Blogger SamClemenz said...

Meet the new "Boss" same as the old Boss. If you're big enough and have enough money you win - end game!
The current settlement amounts to less than 2 months worth of profits given their current 2006 revenue figures.

At 30/12/06 12:55 am, Blogger bomber said...

God I hate them sam! Let's hope karma will get them!

At 31/12/06 10:02 am, Blogger SamClemenz said...

Somehow Bomber, I don't think Kharma is a factor with these guys. It's going to take some serious action on the part of a people who have become fat, lazy, and completely apathetic. A people who have been pushed further and further into the dark corner, and had their collective Larynx extracted by the new Boss' well honed system.
A rebuild is in order, and the new bunch just elected may be able to only accomplish a small amount of the job because they all have their faces buried in the trough with the Empires Storm Troopers.

Funny how the guy who played Darth Vader in Episode VI of Star Wars on TV3 looks like Dick Cheney??? I bet Dick would like a Light-saber! That way he wouldn't need a shotgun.


Post a Comment

<< Home