- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Thursday, October 19, 2006

Climate Denial


Bellamy warms to scientists' scepticism on climate change
Internationally renowned environmental campaigner Professor David Bellamy has joined the New Zealand group of scientists trying to refute what they believe are unfounded claims about man-made global warming. Dr Bellamy, who joins scientists such as former MetService chief meteorologist Dr Augie Auer in the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition, was introduced to the group through a member in England.

And who are the NZ Climate Science Coalition?

The newly formed group of 'climate scientists' is about politics and big business, not science, says Greenpeace.

"It is a sad day for New Zealand when we are subjected to the type of tactics endorsed by a Republician memo on how to confuse the public on the science, to allow the burning of fossil fuels," says Greenpeace Climate Change campaigner, Vanessa Atkinson.

The memo states: "Should the public come to believe the scientific issues are settled, their views about global warming will change accordingly. Therefore, you need to continue to make the lack of scientific certainty a primary issue in the debate." (1)

"It is a well known strategy by vested interests to cast doubt on the climate science. But the debate is over. The scientific majority agrees - climate change is happening and it is caused by human activities. What we are seeing in the formation of the Climate Science Coalition is the death throes of the climate change sceptic," Ms Atkinson says.

Burning fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas) for our energy needs, produces carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is one of the major contributors to climate change. Those that stand to lose the most require a debate to encourage uncertainty to protect their interests.

For example, Exxon-Mobil, the biggest oil company in the world, has spent more than NZD$18.8 million funding groups and climate sceptics to challenge the science of climate change. (2)

In 2003, Exxon-Mobil funded the Tech Central Science Foundation to the tune of NZ$151,430 and two of the members of the coalition - Vincent Gray and Bob Carter have been contributing writers to that foundation.

Why would anyone cast doubt on the largest body of scientific effort ever assembled on planet - the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) a collaboration of over 1,500 climate experts from around the world that 17 national academies of science have endorsed as the pre-emininent authority on climate science on the planet?

Why would anyone argue against 11 national science academies who issued a joint statement to the G8 Summit that acknowledged G8 nations have been responsible for much of the past greenhouse gas emissions? Or recent participants at Wellington's Climate Change and Governance conference who all agree climate change is real and happening. Or the International Climate Change Taskforce has said we have only ten years to act to avoid very dangerous levels of climate change.

"The scientific community is united, the debate is over," says Ms Atkinson.

Greenpeace

6 Comments:

At 20/10/06 10:04 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Fucking oil companies doing all they can to pollute the real science showing us that through our greed we are destroying the planet - but I love how all those right wingers now believe in Global Warming, but are still too frightened to admit how bad it will be.

 
At 20/10/06 11:11 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

who are the NZ climate science coalition? here is their site, why not check it out?
a bit of balance wouldnt go amiss here, you have Greenpeace links, why not the rest of the debate? o i forgot, Greenpeace says the debate is over...

 
At 20/10/06 11:32 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Im sorry Josh - since when did Exxon become 'part of the debate'?

 
At 20/10/06 12:50 pm, Blogger Lyndon said...

Most of the CSC releases Scoop gets have tended to the political lately, but some of the sciencesque stuff has depressed me.

Lately they've been saying the world temp's been stable for 6-odd years. Perhaps, but have you seen the 14 before that?

I blogged here
http://fightingtalk.blogspot.com/2006/06/lyndon-hood-biting-man-lower-hutt.html

Or I recommend folloowing the links here:
http://fightingtalk.blogspot.com/2006/07/lyndon-hood-tyre-change-denier-lower.html

Judging by the range of views the represent, I've always assumed their main purpose was to muddy the waters.

One a slightly more positive note, here's another case of New Zealand producing a disproportionate number of the world's misfits.

 
At 24/10/06 2:45 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Interesting that at least two of the Coalition have North American accents:
Dennis Dutton and Augie Auer.

Dutton's Arts and Letters Daily seems to contain a significant pro-Neo-con bias.

How many of these yanks have infiltrated positions of influence in New Zealand?

"Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you." -anon.

 
At 27/10/06 12:32 am, Blogger Bomber said...

...
good post lyndon

 

Post a Comment

<< Home