- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Thursday, September 21, 2006

Helen Clark is a Machiavellian Genius


This from the Herald
Prime Minister Helen Clark yesterday attacked National leader Don Brash as a "corrosive and cancerous" person and unfit to lead New Zealand - just moments after she condemned the use of personal attacks and extreme rhetoric.

She also called him divisive and polarizing and invited the National Party caucus to get rid of him.


And of course Helen said that right after the Greens announced

In a move which ratchets up pressure on Labour, the Greens have joined the growing number of parties that will pay back any taxpayer money found to have been unlawfully spent on electioneering.

Greens co-leader Jeanette Fitzsimons yesterday unveiled her party's position in Wellington and said her MPs would not support legislation to validate unlawful spending.

"Despite the Auditor-General's interpretation of the rules being vastly different from ours and the other parties, the Green caucus has taken a decision that we will pay back whatever expenditure is ultimately determined to be unlawful," Ms Fitzsimons said.

"We want to make it clear that by doing this, we are not accepting any guilt - we are merely acknowledging that once there is a final legal ruling, we have to respect that."


So what is Helen doing? By telling the National Caucus to dump Don, she has cemented him in place (no opposition Caucus could be credible if it took the advice of the Prime Minister) so many will have to shelve their justifiable leadership ambitions and stand behind Don. Which is breathing space Helen needs now that the Greens have decided to do the honourable thing and agree to pay the $65 000 back. Notice how Helen came out with this after the Greens had announced they would – the pressure that would have created would have been immense, and throwing this attack at Don doesn’t harm her Labour base, but it does polarize National supports who will be justifiably furious, and let’s all note the irony that polarization is the very thing Helen is accusing Don of being.

I agree with Helen, Don is a cancer. The way he gave legitimacy to garden variety racism with his ‘Maaaari get too much speech”, and his follow up “Let’s force poor people to sell their infants into adoption” are icings to his “let’s dump the dole and force the unemployed to line up outside Post Offices and fight for work on a day to day basis” shitcake. HOWEVER – all that said this still doesn't let Helen off the $800 000 hook.

By attacking Don so viscously, she will energize the National party support as everyone blindly rushes in to support ‘the Leader’. This will make any coup against him impossible, which is exactly what Helen needs right now after the Greens have gone and done the right thing (Rod Donald would be smiling). By cementing Don in place she has a chance of winning the next election, and the way things are going, the “NEVER DON” vote could be all she has to keep her in. She is betting that there is one more person in the country who hates Don than hates her. That is the sad reality of what our Parliament has become.

11 Comments:

At 21/9/06 9:00 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

the fact that you have called her on her machiavellian modus "operendi" [not sure if i spelt that correcty] means by definition that she has not been successful. i voted labour! i am shaking my head with dissapointment. unfortunately, the one of low morals, offers nothing that is superior.

 
At 21/9/06 1:26 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

labour are having a slanging match with national...all as the lesbo says she is not into 'dispcable' mud slinging. this lady is the real cancer who needs to take her gay hubby and lesbian girlfriend away to never never land so that nz doesnt have to put up with her anymore. and does anyone think that referring to a human as a terrible disease is somewhat insensitive and shows what a bitch she is??

 
At 21/9/06 1:28 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Christ you whinging right wingers piss me off. None of this is Helen's fault. The person who leaked the affair was Trevor Mallard and he has since been repremanded by the PM.

 
At 21/9/06 1:36 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

gee thomas..he really got ticked off by her aye. "now trevor, i love your work their today and i think its great. im telling you off just so i can try and look good..god knows my appearance needs all the help it can get"...

 
At 21/9/06 1:41 pm, Blogger Bomber said...

...
Although points to Thomas for not denegrating anyone in his comment it must be said

 
At 21/9/06 5:06 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It appalls me that National should be making political capital over her and her husband's homosexuality. That is their business. Surely we accept this in the 21st Century people! And 17 is nearly 18, probably looks 18, and 18 is legal in most states in America.

 
At 21/9/06 5:25 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well maybe not California, but most places...

 
At 21/9/06 5:26 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Probably legal in Thailand I'd imagine...

 
At 21/9/06 7:56 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well most of these comments above are a complete waste of 1's and 0's.
She does not need to be a machiavellian genius when fully supported by TV1 or as i like to call it Klark Propaganda One. Mark Sainsbury had Don and helen on tonight and did not once ask the gargoyle if she would pay back the 800k that they trousered. It was one of the most simperingly compliant pieces I have seen since Holmes was pensioned off.
All he wanted to do was play at being Henry kissinger when he had her on live with a perfect opportunity to tell her how to fix the problem with one simple gesture. Pay it back.

 
At 21/9/06 8:11 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I just don't get it. Helen Clark should be the last one to complain about someone's homosexuality being made public, because in her view "what is wrong with being gay"?

I don't get why she doesn't come clean on the fact that she is a lesbian. This is nothing new, the 'rumours' have been around ever since she entered parliament. Think of the publicity, NZ would have the first openly Lesbian PM. She could really cash in on that.

Peter Davis could cash in on his homsexuality too. He could tour the world giving interviews to tabloid newspapers and gossip magazines: "I was the NZ lesbian PM's sham partner for 25 years". This could put NZ on the map.

 
At 21/9/06 8:12 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I just don't get it. Helen Clark should be the last one to complain about someone's homosexuality being made public, because in her view "what is wrong with being gay"?

I don't get why she doesn't come clean on the fact that she is a lesbian. This is nothing new, the 'rumours' have been around ever since she entered parliament. Think of the publicity, NZ would have the first openly Lesbian PM. She could really cash in on that.

Peter Davis could cash in on his homsexuality too. He could tour the world giving interviews to tabloid newspapers and gossip magazines: "I was the NZ lesbian PM's sham partner for 25 years". This could put NZ on the map.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home