- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Monday, March 29, 2010

she works hard for the moneyshot


Versalko sex worker 'entitled to the money'
The sex worker paid more than $2.4 million by ASB fraudster Stephen Versalko is entitled to the money as it was earned in a private client arrangement, says a prostitutes' lobby group. The ASB is suing the mother of one, who has name suppression, to recover some of the $17.8 million Versalko stole over nine years. He spent most of the money on property and lifestyle - including paying at least $3.4 million to two prostitutes and showering them with $800,000 of gifts.

Oh come on, taking the money off the prostitutes who worked so hard to please this creepy, lying, rat-faced wonder who stole millions to feed his white collar crime lifestyle? How were the prostitutes to know he was stealing the money? Perhaps ASB should take a longer look at their own role in allowing slack procedures to have $18 million disappear than chasing prostitutes for cash.

8 Comments:

At 29/3/10 8:38 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Because prostitutes don't get paid in the millions bomber.

Doh!

Btw, don't worry, the Head Hunters will have that coin all nicely invested by now.

 
At 29/3/10 9:50 am, Anonymous travellerev said...

Maybe she was just damned good and the creep was prepared to pay that much her for it.

That's free market capitalism at it's best for ya.

 
At 29/3/10 10:40 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Mostly it seems,if defense counsel is accurate, stolen money in these sorts of circumstances ends up in the coffers of casino's and pub pokies.

Can't remember a single instance of 'recovery' being instigated in those directions...

 
At 29/3/10 1:02 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This post is retarded.

The hooker was blackmailing the creep. Therefore for you claim it was 'earned' is to sanction a criminal offence.

But then again I expect nothing less from someone who wants to allow drug dealers to peddle their poison to our children.

 
At 29/3/10 4:42 pm, Blogger Bomber said...

The hooker was blackmailing the creep. Therefore for you claim it was 'earned' is to sanction a criminal offence.

She was blackmailing him? Wouldn't that have to be proven first anon?

 
At 29/3/10 5:17 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"She was blackmailing him? Wouldn't that have to be proven first anon?"

That's pretty easy really after all who would give a hooker 2 million dollars? You can prove it though inference really.

It's going to get nasty for her when the IRD get involved since she obviously hasn't declared it as income.

 
At 29/3/10 8:42 pm, Anonymous Anonymous said...

ahh, good point anon, youd bet thats about to get taxed to fuckery and back!

 
At 30/3/10 11:30 am, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So what going to happen is a double fucking by ASB suing rightfully to get their cash back and then the IRD comes after her for non-payment of taxes.

Serves her right really.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home